The space travel is fantastic these days and people are very fascinated towards it but there are many environmental problems in our planet that need to be resolved first. What is your opinion? Should money be spent on space travel or on environmental issues?
Recently, the phenomenon of space travel and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated dispute. Although contested by many that the matter of spending money on space technology is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that study of space exploration can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, getting information about space exploration can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that unfolding the unsolved mysteries, as well as discovering the existence of life in another planet, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of extraterrestrial organisms on interstellar space. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both nearby galaxies and the Earth’ gravity apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, funding for space exploration might increase the consequences of exotic species. Moreover, fundamental aspects of space programs would relate to this reality that the demerits of discovering meteorites pertain to the satellite communication company. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the space shuttle is correlated negatively with pollution of the environment. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of sending the satellite into space.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of funding for space exploration outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of a telecommunication satellite prove the significance of space research centers, but also pinpoint practical implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-05 | Alireza.r.m | 80 | view |
| 2020-02-28 | Alireza.r.m | 86 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | Mpaul | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-26 | hemsingh81 | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-12 | mojtaba1980 | 80 | view |
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. Choose which position you most agr 85
- If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/subject will you choose? 11
- The environment we are living in is in danger due to various problems...so who do u think Should be responsible to solve it? Is it the governments, organization or each individual? 80
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. Choose which position you most agr 80
- If Voting Is Compulsory In A Democratic Society What Conclusions Can We Draw About Nature Of Democracy 42
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 281.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77580071174 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36772529881 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633451957295 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6381912032 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.25 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4166666667 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192640009065 0.242375264174 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652725537941 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0267033475769 0.071462118173 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108911038753 0.151781067708 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475853233959 0.0609392437508 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 53.1260098522 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.85 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.