Whether studying films at school is as important as studying literature? Do you think school should have curriculum asking students to play old drama and work for theater centuries ago?
In recent years, there is an ongoing debate about do schools should ask students to play old dramas written centuries ago. Group of people claim that playing an old plays will help students to understand human evolution and development. Others reject this notion and argue that it is sheer wastage of time. The substantial influence of studying literature has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend in recent years. I strongly disagree with the statement that schools should not maintain separate curriculum asking students to play old drama. This essay would further discuss both sides in detail with justifying reasons and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
To begin with, the prime benefit of studying drama and other history make students aware of the traditions, cultures, customs, rituals and life style of our ancient people. These plays about various communities assist pupil in understanding human behavior. For example, Shakespeare is not recognized as famous drama player in the 16th century but now his dramas hold the highest views in social media networks and inspire other people to choose their career. Besides this, young generations will learn lessons from these acts and will try to avoid those mistakes in present era. Thus studying literature teach young people to travel in right path and avoid wrong customs.
On the flip side, studying arts and playing dramas during student career is considered as waste of time and energy. In the fast growing world, where innovations and developments are happening on daily basis, youngsters are required to concentrate more towards modern sciences and technologies which help them in excel in academic and professional fields. Furthermore, these events may distract young people mind from studies. For instance, emotional and tragedy scenes may damage students' concentration on future.
According to the arguments aforementioned, one can reach out to point that these literatures are not beneficial for student growth in any terms. In a nutshell, I personally believe that educational departments should focus more on modern developments and innovations,
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples. 77
- Some people believe that academic subjects such as chemistry, physics, and history should be taught in schools, while others believe that students will derive more benefit from studying practical subjects, such as motor mechanics and cooking. 77
- Nowadays the bickering has common trend amongst youngsters and married people This has led polygamy and high divorce rates Justify the response with your positive or negative views 79
- The traditional subjects are soon moving off in last year s Kindly provide the solutions and ideas to save such objects 44
- Put the examination at the end of the semester or separated small tests throughout the entire semester, which one do you agree? 65
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, if, may, so, thus, for example, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 8.36945812808 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 31.9359605911 147% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 1207.87684729 151% => OK
No of words: 335.0 242.827586207 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4328358209 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 3.92707691288 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74583708484 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 139.433497537 156% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64776119403 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 379.143842365 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3758818703 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.058823529 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7058823529 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05882352941 7.25397266985 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290429135906 0.242375264174 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845570199077 0.0925447433944 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0957506042304 0.071462118173 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15148301897 0.151781067708 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0929734449739 0.0609392437508 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 12.6369458128 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.