The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagram presents the proportion of four different Canadian retail categories' shopping sales via web in years 2005and 2010.
Overall, Electronics and Appliance seem to be top purchased items by customers in 2005 while food and beverage took its place in 2010.
In 2005, 35% was accounted for the items sold online by Electronics and Appliance sector. It was approximately twice as much by the least bought products - video games. Home Furnishings came second as the most sold items with 25% of the total sales online; while the third one was Food and Beverage with 22%.
After five years, having the most increased rate, Food and Beverage became in-demand to consumers, growing by 10% more compared to year 2005. Video games also became popular in the latter year with an increase of 5% more. Meanwhile, Electronics and Appliance, together with Home Furnishings went downhill with a decrease of 5% and 10% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-06 | Netra patel | 67 | view |
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and give y 78
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton. 56
- Big is salary is much more important than job satisfaction. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- Number of Students in a Kaplan International College in the UK in 2009 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 779.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.125 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6739775472 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.651315789474 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.4656631565 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.375 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0981322244266 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454251064344 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528287559952 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0658950682488 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384203561893 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.