The graph below shows average co2 emission per person in the United Kingdom,Sweden , Italy and Protugal between 1967- 2007.
The given line graph depicts, the carbon dioxide fumes per person in four varies types of countries ( United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal) between 1967- 2007.
According tho the chart , United Kingson country was the highest co2 emission while Protugal was the lowest. On the other hand , United Kingdom co2 was decreased gradually in 2007. It was just under a 12. Obviously Sweden was increased progressively , in 1977 year dropped rapidly. Conversely , Italy and Protugal co2 fumes shown approximately same. Although, Italy was fluctuated significantly throughout the period whereas Protugal was scored steadily end of the period. Overall, a large proportion co2 emission per person in United Kingdom while a tiny fraction was Protugal. Sweden and Protugal countries approach over the period.
- The graph below shows the consumption of three spread from 191. - 2007 73
- The chart below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the parkway hotel how the rated the hotel's customer service. The same questionnaire was given 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 61
- The chart below shows the male and female internet users aged 15 24 in Canada in 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Sime people say that leisure time is important for having a good life while other belive that money is important Do you agree or disagree 48
- The line graph below show the population size birth and death rate of ENgland and Whales from 1700 to 2000 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...person in four varies types of countries United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portug...
^^
Line 3, column 24, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... 1967- 2007. According tho the chart , United Kingson country was the highest ...
^^
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...otugal was the lowest. On the other hand , United Kingdom co2 was decreased gradua...
^^
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ously Sweden was increased progressively , in 1977 year dropped rapidly. Conversel...
^^
Line 3, column 293, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...in 1977 year dropped rapidly. Conversely , Italy and Protugal co2 fumes shown appr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, if, so, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 33.7804878049 33% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 676.0 965.302439024 70% => OK
No of words: 122.0 196.424390244 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54098360656 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.32345618554 3.73543355544 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70214494459 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.647540983607 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 203.4 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.9551815917 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.1111111111 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.5555555556 22.9334400587 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383142138467 0.215688989381 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151293485655 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109926513783 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.325523175632 0.15604864568 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542538159912 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.26 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.