The graph below shows average co2 emission per person in the United Kingdom,Sweden , Italy and Protugal between 1967- 2007.
The given line graph depicts, the carbon dioxide fumes per person in four varies types of countries ( United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal) between 1967- 2007.
According tho the chart , United Kingson country was the highest co2 emission while Protugal was the lowest. On the other hand , United Kingdom co2 was decreased gradually in 2007. It was just under a 12. Obviously Sweden was increased progressively , in 1977 year dropped rapidly. Conversely , Italy and Protugal co2 fumes shown approximately same. Although, Italy was fluctuated significantly throughout the period whereas Protugal was scored steadily end of the period. Overall, a large proportion co2 emission per person in United Kingdom while a tiny fraction was Protugal. Sweden and Protugal countries approach over the period.
- Scientist predict that all people will chose to talk the same global language in the future. Do you think positive or negative development? 56
- The pie chart below shows tge results of a survey of the causes foor poor learning outcomes in schools in a particularly country in 2011. 56
- The line graph below shows the case of diseases caused by x virus in Australia from 1960 to 1995. 56
- The bar chart below shiws the global sales of television by supervision incorporataion from 1999 2012 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of three spread from 191. - 2007 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...person in four varies types of countries United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portug...
^^
Line 3, column 24, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... 1967- 2007. According tho the chart , United Kingson country was the highest ...
^^
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...otugal was the lowest. On the other hand , United Kingdom co2 was decreased gradua...
^^
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ously Sweden was increased progressively , in 1977 year dropped rapidly. Conversel...
^^
Line 3, column 293, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...in 1977 year dropped rapidly. Conversely , Italy and Protugal co2 fumes shown appr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, if, so, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 33.7804878049 33% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 676.0 965.302439024 70% => OK
No of words: 122.0 196.424390244 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54098360656 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.32345618554 3.73543355544 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70214494459 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.647540983607 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 203.4 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.9551815917 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.1111111111 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.5555555556 22.9334400587 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383142138467 0.215688989381 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151293485655 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109926513783 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.325523175632 0.15604864568 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542538159912 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.26 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.