Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There are plenty of various professions around the globe starting from janitors and ending with scientists. For some reason all these jobs are paid divergently. We know ordinary office workers whose salaries are not so high, at the same time we also know celebrities who like to attend luxury events, buy expensive cars and jewelries. One such example is a huge wage gap between successful sportsmen and other important professions.
Some people try to justify these circumstances by market relations. In other words if well-known athletes earn that amount of money that means people are interested in sports rather than other spheres of life. Why Cristiano Ronaldo is the highest paid athlete according to Forbes? The answer is obvious. Football is the most popular sport in the world uniting all the nations and countries. Ronaldo is widely known all around the world besides Europe. So it pushes the idea that their salaries are even fair.
The other good side of big salaries in sports is massive influence to population attracting the attention of younger generation to sport. The more people will go in for sports the healthier they will be.
Don't forget that the carrier of an athlete is very short. Some of them have to end their careers due to injuries. That makes their work justified.
It's impossible to deny negative aspects of the issue. First of all, it's necessary to note not so importance of celebrities compared to teachers, scientists, and doctors. Secondly, in several countries athletes are unreasonably high-paid at the expense of state fund. A vivid example of this is a game of foreign players in Kazakhstan football championship.
Nevertheless, all this is done for the popularization of sports in mass. As for me it's not pity to spend some money in order to develop the sport everywhere.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-04 | happyhappy | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Sadrarouhi | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | morbymuku | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | ngannguyen | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | WIWI UMAR | 61 | view |
- The widespread use of Internet has brought many problems. What do you think are the main problems associated with the use of the web? What solutions can you suggest? 78
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- With the pressure on today's people to succeed academically, some people believe that non-academic subjects at school (e.g.: physical education and cookery should be removed from the syllabus so that children can wholly concentrate on academic subjects. T 77
- The charts below show UK and USA energy consumption in 2000 and 2006 86
- University should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: Don't
...for sports the healthier they will be. Dont forget that the carrier of an athlete i...
^^^^
Line 9, column 73, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...r the popularization of sports in mass. As for me its not pity to spend some money...
^^
Line 9, column 83, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...larization of sports in mass. As for me its not pity to spend some money in order t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, as for, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04635761589 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74883902036 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615894039735 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.7321301348 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.2727272727 106.682146367 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.7272727273 20.7667163134 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72727272727 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19114993461 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455606889956 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061705490131 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.086936379259 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552720805574 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.0946893788 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 50.2224549098 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.