Some people believe that it is more important to teach children the literature of their own country than other countries. Do you agree or disagree?
Literature would be a vital part of a nation to analyze enhancing variety of particular subject or history. Someone thinks that educate local literature to students may more beneficial than other countries literary works. In this essay I strongly disagree with that statement because, instruct own literary composition does not help students to improve global knowledge and different cultures.
Students are the steps to over coming years and so make use of international literature may upgrade local literature in creativity and awareness as well. Teaching other writings would help learners to improve their inquisitive nature and identify similarities and differentiation. Moreover, many studies reveals that, learning multi-literature would promote history of arts, cultures even story's of wars in varies nations. By virtue of that students could aware of such histories and may have peaceful mind towards foreigners too. For instance, prevalent habit of foreign literature raise the value of global cultural arrangements in any countries, such as international film festivals.
Conversely, local literature only help students to improve their own works and histories again and again. At once, this might be fear and misunderstanding of other literature and could be develop narrow minded students. Promoting own literary writings in schools might produce lack of respect and ignorance to other traditions also. Furthermore, studying local literature shows only one side of the world and its inhabitants.
In conclusion, literature flourish our own history arts and cultures. Nevertheless, learning and teaching multi literal works also exaggerate the value of own nation along with the outsiders point of view and perceptions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-02 | Raman kanda | 61 | view |
- the chart below shows the average spending on cloths per person in US in 1985 1995 and 2005 56
- The graph shows average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the uk devided into three categories, from 1995 -2002. summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevent. 73
- The pie chart below shows the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007
- The pie charts show figures for the use of public libraries in 1990 and 2000 in Britain Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ies again and again. At once, this might be fear and misunderstanding of other li...
^^
Line 5, column 253, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tudents. Promoting own literary writings in schools might produce lack of respect...
^^
Line 5, column 330, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...spect and ignorance to other traditions also. Furthermore, studying local literature...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, furthermore, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1483.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7480620155 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05252429524 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62015503876 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.1730095679 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.928571429 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202271184299 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690595362342 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436236425958 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122296461133 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0221654315736 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.