Some people think that robots are important for human’s future development. Others think that robots have negative effects on society. Discuss both views and give your opinion
It is often debatable that, robots play a vital role in the modern world and some others disagree and forwards the precious effects on robots. However, my opinion is robots are inevitable and it is difficult to live without their support in the upcoming future.
Some people believe that dependency on robots would make life complicated, lazy and none productive. To elaborate, robots works with the support of software and computers and the problems with them would create sophisticated conditions and may lead to a big loss in life. Similarly, forthcoming generations are reliable to this development and would make it difficult to live without this support and may have more issues in terms of accidental, suicidal and psychological.
On the other hand, robots are essential in future development in many ways such as medical, educational, economic and financial. This technology makes life easier and helps professionals positively. For instance, many surgeries are performed with the support of robots in hospitals where doctors' eyes could not reach them. Moreover, counting and calculations would be more flexible for the robots than for humans thereby works and productivity would be higher than normal. Students can learn things easily with the advanced technological support of robots in schools.
To sum up, in my opinion, usage of robots meaningfully would have cherish the world and people can works more efficient and profitable in future.
- the chart below shows the average spending on cloths per person in US in 1985 1995 and 2005 56
- Society would benefit from a complete ban on all forms of advertisement To what extent do you agree or disagree 46
- Directors of large companies receive much higher salaries than ordinary employees do Some people think it s necessary but others holds it is unfair Discuss both perspectives and give your opinion 73
- The maps below show a science park in 2008 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Map of a City in 1950 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 499, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r than normal. Students can learn things easily with the advanced technological s...
^^
Line 5, column 67, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'cherished'.
Suggestion: cherished
...usage of robots meaningfully would have cherish the world and people can works more eff...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...can works more efficient and profitable in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, similarly, so, for instance, such as, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1228.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 230.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33913043478 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88375936113 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578260869565 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9088541659 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.636363636 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.90909090909 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234949569378 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910942430198 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471245527245 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146110760201 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292305420845 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.