People usually mix their private and professional life. What is the pros and cons of this?
Recently, the phenomenon of mixing private and professional life and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of satisfying all aspects of life is highly beneficial, such issue regarded as thoroughly both constructive and positive by remarkable individuals. I am inclined to believe that personal activities can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, intermix of professional and personal life can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of a normal life, as well as life experiences, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experience which discovered a lifeless performance. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both social background and having work boundaries apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, combining work and home life might prove the significance of lifelike behaviors. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the individual senses could relate to this reality that the demerits of a permanent employment pertain to employment opportunities. For instance, some scientific research conducted by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of a leadership role is correlated negatively with a clever idea. Hence, it is forcefully delineated the 5 may be considered.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that combinations of private lives and work can be plus, not only do the advantages of successful careers prove the significance of serious competition, but also pinpoint social implications
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-03 | yasamin.gharib62 | 77 | view |
2018-07-12 | minapolo | 88 | view |
2018-06-12 | mojtaba1980 | 79 | view |
2018-06-05 | Mehdi.Babaie | 88 | view |
2018-06-03 | bashirheidari | 85 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5785440613 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31861373244 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639846743295 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.0225232349 50.4703680194 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.363636364 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7272727273 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72727272727 7.25397266985 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140877723115 0.242375264174 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0481923806103 0.0925447433944 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622531101815 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0789140543948 0.151781067708 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050671564255 0.0609392437508 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.71 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.