Some people regard to video games as harmless fun, or even as a useful education tool. Other, however, believe that videos games are having an adverse effect on the people who play them. In your opinion, do the drawbacks of video game outweigh benefits.
Hardly can anyone deny the increasing popularity of video games in recent year. There are a school of thought that video games have advantage. While I accept that this trend has true, I believe that the setbacks are more significant.
One the hand, there are some benefits of playing games, one of which is that it is entertaining. A lot of video games attracts user because of interesting detail. When they play game, they will be fun due to if they lose they can play more and more times. Therefore, they don’t be stress. Besides, the video game can be education. Various lessons such as learning foreign language are designed as game instead of boring lesson. It helps people can not only understand but also make them fun.
One the other hand, I am convinced that the drawbacks of playing game are more significant. First, games are highly addictive because user are constantly given score, new targets and frequent reward to keep them playing. Many children even teenager now spent hours each day trying to get higher levels of a game than their friends or just pass the levels. This type of addiction can have effect ranging from lack of sleep to problems at school. Besides, they spent a lot of their time on game and don’t care about the world. In the long term, they are separate themselves, someone can be becoming selfish.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the potential dangers of video games are more significant than the possible benefits.
- Some people believe that living in big cities is becoming more difficult. Others believe that it is getting easier. Discuss both view and give your own opinion. 56
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 78
- the graph below changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 to 2011 73
- the line charts compare how much time it would take for three companies to manufacture a car from 200 to 2012 56
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel's customer service. The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1215.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78346456693 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46738600061 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606299212598 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.0665902647 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 71.4705882353 106.682146367 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9411764706 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41176470588 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318348640353 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106420551855 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780369903833 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202972360618 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322183026213 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.0946893788 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 50.2224549098 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.85 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.