Nowadays some countries encourage people to buy more and more products, while others believe it has negative effects on the society.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There is a phenomenon that governments in some countries take measures to stimulate consumers to purchase more goods, while people hold opposite views toward this issue. Both sides of this argument will be discussed in this essay, followed by my own opinion.
People who advocate this trend may have following reasons. Firstly, the increasing consumption of goods could benefit the economy. It will drive the demand for more products, which could improve the productivity; it can also generate more employment opportunities, increase people’s income and enable them to afford more products and services. Consequently, there will be constantly increasing demand for products. Furthermore, purchasing more products can provide a sense of fulfillment for consumers. It is proven by psychologists that the purchasing behavior can increase happiness to people because people would feel that they can control their life by consumption.
However, for those who against people to buy more products, they may also have persuasive reasons. To begin with, factories have to produce more products to meet the rising demand, this will result in more pollutant emissions, land-use and deforestation, which are main factors contributing to climate change. In addition, in order to buy more goods, people have to work harder to earn more money. As the working time becomes longer, the time spend with friends and family would be inevitably reduced. Thus, they may lose some close friends who can share happiness and sorrow with and more disputes may occur with the family.
To conclude, the national-wide pursuit for economic prosperity brings both benefits and drawbacks. In my opinion, the encouragement for people to buy more goods can contribute to the economic development and bring happiness to individuals. But the negative impacts on the environment and personal relationship cannot be neglected.
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Some people think that the main purpose of school is to turn children to good citizens and workers, rather than benefit them as individuals.To what extend do you agree or disagree? 67
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals suffer, while others are in favor of them 56
- Many people believe that it is important to protect the environment but they make no effort to protect it themselves Why do you think it is the case What actions do you think that individuals can do to protect the environment 81
- Many people believe that the human society has developed into a throw away society which is filled with plastic bags and rubbish What are the causes and solutions 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 676, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... can control their life by consumption. However, for those who against people to...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, while, in addition, in fact, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53767123288 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94634216676 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571917808219 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7051081515 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0625 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6875 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282010963945 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909949478062 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070598980618 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173417452916 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267317491021 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.