Some people think the increasing business and cultural contact between countries brings many positive effects. Others say it causes the loss of national identities.
Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
There are conflicting views regarding whether more connections between different countries bring more merits or demerits. Both sides of this argument will be discussed in this essay, followed by my own opinion.
For those who claim that the increasing cross-cultural activities and economic cooperation is beneficial, they may have following reasons. To begin with, trading activities have become more active due to the increasing business collaboration between countries. This helps people all over the world purchase and sells products at a competitive price, which could promote productivity and improve the economy; it can also generate more employment opportunities related to the trading industry. Moreover, culture exchange allows people to have more contacts with others from different backgrounds, which could eliminate misunderstandings between countries. Thus, conflicts can be effectively avoided, and it could help build a harmonious world.
Nevertheless, for those who believe that this trend could impair national identities, they can also justify this opinion. Firstly, the invasion of dominant cultures might negatively influence on the development of domestic cultural industries. For example, most people tend to watch Hollywood blockbusters more than local films, this has led to the fading of film industry in many countries. Furthermore, teenagers are easily to be influenced by the environment, some of them might imitate foreign culture blindly if they are being exposed to large amounts of information about other culture. This would impair their sense of national belongings.
In conclusion, the increasing international contacts could positively influence the global economy and world peace. However, its negative impacts on national identities cannot be neglected, governments should pay attention to cultural heritage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-13 | sim_11 | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-22 | Jagdeep kaur | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-06 | Hai Bung Bia | 84 | view |
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981,1991 and 2001.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Many countries use fossil fuels such as coal or oil as the main sources of energy. However, in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged.Do you think this a positive or negative development? 56
- Today ,the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold.Do you agree or disagree? 78
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small number of people Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages while others believe that would be a waste of money Discuss and give 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.96254681648 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06230109597 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670411985019 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3427841604 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.714285714 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92857142857 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193039931754 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637269621094 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0310228462583 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11497181222 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205693549776 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.29 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.