some people say that personal information for a job is futile. do you agree or disagree and up to what extent
In today’s time, applying for the job has become a tedious task. This is because the application forms require a detailed account of both personal and professional information. Some people think that the personal information is not relevant to the job, while others believe it is useful for the employer.
I believe that personal information creates an image of the applicant in the minds of the employee which can be misleading. I would like to cite an example of a job profile where all the candidates belong to downtown or rural place were not selected for the job. Since, they required an articulate person. However, there was a probability of having an articulate aspirant from the rural background. This has created a ruckus and people denied submitting their personal details. As it assists to discriminate people on the basis of their residential place.
On the other hand, it can be instrumental in defining a person’s attitude towards work and his colleagues. For example, a married person is considered more stable, responsible and calculative. Whereas, a single person is presumed to be a risk taker, energetic and highly ambitious. This will help an employer to assess the person he requires according to his needs. In addition to it, a person’s hobbies or interest shows his inclination and creativity, this can be used to examine whether the candidate is creative, logical or a diplomat. That enables an employer to choose the right candidate
In conclusion, I would like to mention that although the personal information could be of great use to the employer, but it also creates the ground for discrimination. Together with it, nowadays people are seeking expert advice for the resume which helps them to furnish false personality to deceive the employers. Therefore, one can’t completely rely on the details provided by the applicant alone and hence there is a need for a non-judgmental interview.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-23 | divya dixit | 78 | view |
| 2018-05-23 | divya dixit | 78 | view |
- EDUCATION IS MORE ABOUT LEARNING FACTS RATHER THAN IN PRACTICAL APPLICATION. 84
- write a letter to your friendsay what type of party eg themed, fancy dress etc.suggest a suitable venuemake recommendation as to entertainment 11
- a staggering amount of food is wasted every year both in business and households Why is this happening and what could be done to tackle this problem 77
- write a letter to your friendsay what type of party eg themed, fancy dress etc.suggest a suitable venuemake recommendation as to entertainment 78
- write a letter to your friendsay what type of party eg themed, fancy dress etc.suggest a suitable venuemake recommendation as to entertainment 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 263, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...al place were not selected for the job. Since, they required an articulate person. Ho...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 478, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nied submitting their personal details. As it assists to discriminate people on th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, so, therefore, whereas, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16825396825 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06186485282 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584126984127 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1679748013 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7647058824 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5294117647 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.82352941176 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212062536728 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742410072112 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585341334569 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147527102826 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549354705211 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.