The extensive use of Internet and computers in variety of activities and especially in education has led to a debate that because of over-dependence of computers the role of the teachers will be diminished in the classroom. I, strongly believe that in today’s world classroom teaching cannot be replaced by computers because, computers have limited role to play in the classroom, whereas teachers can teach the students in multiple ways, as per need and provides an excellent learning environment.
Initially, the computers support the classroom teaching, as an excellent aid. In addition to it, internet can provide you a vast pool of knowledge, but it’s only the teacher who can guide you to optimum utilization of the information. Moreover, as a mentor a teacher understand the strengths and weaknesses of his student and can motivate the pupils accordingly from his experience. Unlike computers teachers can always have a one to one interaction and provide the valuable feedback to his students to improve their performance. For instance in Harvard and Oxford University, one mentor is assigned per student throughout his course to guide and evaluate him.
On the other hand computer is a machine. No doubts it follow all the orders given to it and internet consists of ocean of information. It can be of much use, when there is a lack of classroom coaching. In the absence of teacher, internet can substitute the tutor and provide the essential learning. Students can have access to latest information on technology, expert views and opinions and even participate in the virtual lectures.
Last but not the least, we all have to understand that it is the humans who have discovered computers and internet for the benefit of the human race. Internet is just a medium to bring the whole world under one roof. The content available on the internet is the work of humans which is available for everyone to make optimal use of it. It is up to us how much dependent on computers we become or how creative can we can turn into.
- Some people could stay effective in their lives by doing the repetitive routine, such as eating the same diet. Do you think it can apply to everyone? 79
- Is it better to be a good listener or good talker 84
- In many countries the proportion of older people is steadily increasing Does this trend have more positive or negative effects on the society 79
- Nowadays it is noticed that cultural mixing is reflected within local cultural practices. Do you think it is good for the society? 84
- Is it better to be a good listener or good talker? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 55, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'follows'?
Suggestion: follows
...and computer is a machine. No doubts it follow all the orders given to it and internet...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 173, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun classroom seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lack of classrooms'.
Suggestion: a lack of classrooms
...n. It can be of much use, when there is a lack of classroom coaching. In the absence of teacher, in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 325, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the latest'.
Suggestion: to the latest
...tial learning. Students can have access to latest information on technology, expert views...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, moreover, whereas, for instance, in addition, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 8.36945812808 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 31.9359605911 157% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1703.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 342.0 242.827586207 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97953216374 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 3.92707691288 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92595985373 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514619883041 0.580463131201 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 546.3 379.143842365 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7616677244 50.4703680194 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.4375 104.977214359 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6875 7.25397266985 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119252499045 0.242375264174 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0422661446559 0.0925447433944 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443226423843 0.071462118173 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0764713074338 0.151781067708 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0172071462871 0.0609392437508 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.