Disparity in educational quality throughout nations such as the United states has led to efforts for standardization of the curriculum until the end of high school. While a common educational basis would alleviate some of these issues, the given statement is an overreach, as a single curriculum cannot be suited to the needs of all students due to varying abilities and needs.
All students learn differently and at different paces, so it is naïve to impose a single curriculum on every student. Students with intellectual disabilities often require special lessons and might require information to be presented at a slower pace in order to learn effectively. At the same time, high achievers might find themselves bored with a common curriculum geared to the average student, stifling their potential and potentially alienating them from the academic environment through boredom or frustration.
The given title assumes that all students will pursue college after high school, but this is not necessarily the case. Many high school students go on to work in trades as mechanics or electricians, where a knowledge of calculus might not be relevant. As such, it would be prudent to offer flexibility in a high school curriculum to enable these students to develop basic skills they will need to succeed in whatever field they pursue. Even among college bound students, there is a vast difference between engineering and the liberal arts; while a liberal arts student should not neglect the natural sciences and vice versa, it would be valuable to allow students some freedom to specialize through avenues such as AP courses relevant to their field of study.
There can also be large regional differences in a single nation, which would make an unyielding standardized national curriculum imprudent. For example, in Canada, residents of Quebec primarily speak French while the rest of the nation primarily employs English. While resdients of Quebec should know English, imposing an entirely English curriculum would erode the regional culture. Similarly, in American elementary schools students devote some study to local history to develop a sense of awareness and civic engagement that would be lost through an entirely uniform national curriculum. Students in different regions throughout a nation should be proficient in the same basic subjects, but there should also have some freedom in the curriculum for issues relevant to a particular region.
There is a strong argument to be made that the curriculum should be unified throughout nations like the United States to ensure students are not hindered by their socioeconomic backgrounds. At the same time, the federal government should be careful to allow flexibility for differences in individuals’ abilities, interests, and regional concerns to ensure that students are not neglected
- The following is a recommendation from the personnel director to the president of Acme Publishing Company."Many other companies have recently stated that having their employees take the Easy Read Speed-Reading Course has greatly im 55
- The following appeared in a recommendation from the president of Amburg's Chamber of Commerce."Last October the city of Belleville installed high-intensity lighting in its central business district, and vandalism there declined wit 89
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 83
- In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge. 66
- "The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition." - Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or dis 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...of these issues, the given statement is an overreach, as a single curriculum cannot be suite...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, similarly, so, while, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2417.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 446.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41928251121 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93968335389 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526905829596 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 765.0 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1199997647 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.0625 118.986275619 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.875 23.4991977007 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5625 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309614439937 0.243740707755 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108312255817 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481818631287 0.0758088955206 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170943725822 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426433900135 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 14.1392134831 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 48.8420337079 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.1639044944 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 100.480337079 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.