Some people think a job not only provides income but also social life. Others think it is better to develop social life with people you do not work with. Discuss both view.

Nowadays most of us are employed unlike in the olden days where the male member of the family goes for work. In those days the wife is expected to stay at home and take care of kids. Today, everyone can have a work and personal life without the biases created by gender. Some of us think that it is important to work to have a social life while others opine that it is better not to be social with workmates. In the below essay, I will discuss both views and express my opinion.

Today, as work keeps everyone busy and there is the pressure of targets, most of us stay back at work after the regular business hours. When we get back home it is too late to catch up with friends and family. Hence, it is important that we have a social group at work with whom we can have fun and share our personal views with. Friendship and social life at work can strengthen the dynamics of a team.

There can be instances when social life can affect work. For example, team members engaging in gossip and other unprofessional activities can have a negative affect on the office environment. Also, there is a chance for distraction from work.

Looking at the above essay, I conclude that there should be a balance in the social element in work life. It should not be all fun and less work. I think this totally depends on the management style and the professional ethics of the employees in the organisation though.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...essional activities can have a negative affect on the office environment. Also, there is ...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, look, so, then, while, for example, i think

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1155.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.45945945946 5.12529762239 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36776829096 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521235521236 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 366.3 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0274881937 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.0 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2666666667 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290761818877 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100037001923 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0952203156731 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177329785487 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599185599737 0.056905535591 105% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 13.0946893788 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 50.2224549098 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.29 12.4159519038 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 78.4519038076 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.