Cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or Disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of developing the public transportation or constructing new roads, and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although expanding transportation systems is beneficial as it regarded by a substantial number of individuals both constructive and positive, others hold opponents views. I am inclined to believe that this issue can be plus as it could develop some brilliant aspects for its adherents.
From a social standpoint, fostering the transportation systems has several advantageous. These advantages are rooted in the fact of developing. Boosting these systems including subways, monorails, modern taxis and buses provides new and modern accessibilities for settlers. Not only are utilizing these systems easy but also they are cheap. Furthermore, from my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the benefits of expanding public transport. This survey showed that the governments can diminish the traffic, crowdedness and sound and air pollution by encouraging inhabitants to use public transport.
On the one hand, there is no doubt considering of inproving public transport instead of building new roads has some opponents. These citizens argued that governmnet should constract more and more roads in order to boost the transportation conditions.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of expanding the public transportation systems are far more outweigh building new roads.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-03 | anmolchaturvedi | 55 | view |
- Should library use digital gadgets to provide information on different topics? Pros & Cons 46
- What is the best invention of the last 100 years, the computer, antibiotics or the airplane? Why? Explain with examples 11
- Governments promise continuous economic growth, but it is actually illusion. Some people think that governments should abandon this. Give your opinion. 85
- Television has many useful functions to play in everyone’s life, for some its relaxation, for some it is the companion. Discuss your viewpoint and support your answer with examples and discussion point. 77
- The university will deduct the student's score for late assignments, opinions and solutions. 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, so, while, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 31.9359605911 63% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1338.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 230.0 242.827586207 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.81739130435 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32142042632 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639130434783 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9073051176 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 7.25397266985 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187597511407 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640090679103 0.0925447433944 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580016740293 0.071462118173 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123149240236 0.151781067708 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0685736846618 0.0609392437508 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.1260098522 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.