The graphs show changes in spending habits of people in UK between 1971 and 2001. Write a report to a university lecturer describing the data.
The given pie chart illustrates the figure on expending routines of citizens in UK in 1971 and 2001.
It is noted that UK saw a significant change in spending habits of people. It was obvious that cars and food were two things which people used the most usual between 1971 and 2001.
In the first year of the survey, food occupied 44% of the spending habit of the British and reached the highest percentage.However, this number went down remarkably to 14% in 2001. 22% was spending routine of people in UK in 1971.Surprisingly, in following 30 years, it increased to 43% and nearly twice as much as in 1971.
The other pattern also experienced an enormous change. 10% and 9% were the amount which people expended for petrol and furniture respectively in 1979. In 2001, an amount of money which people wasted on petrol and furniture was equal (8%). The British used 7% income for the restaurant in 1971. Interestingly, it went up to double in next 30 years.The proportion of salary spent on the book dropped markedly from 6% to 1% while the percent of income expended for computer jumped from 2% to 12% in 2001.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-20 | Phạm Phú Trường | 84 | view |
| 2018-06-04 | Thien Trang | 78 | view |
| 2018-02-11 | Thira | 84 | view |
| 2016-12-27 | sabzaliyev | 73 | view |
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 56
- Children’s education is expensive. In some countries, the government pay some or all of the costs. Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages? 73
- Some people think success in the life comes from hard work and determination Others think money and appearance are more important Discuss both sides and give your opinion 78
- Many young people who leave school hold a negative attitude towards learning Why does this happen What are the solutions 81
- Some people believe the government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...tish and reached the highest percentage.However, this number went down remarkably to 14...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... this number went down remarkably to 14% in 2001. 22% was spending routine of peo...
^^
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Surprisingly
...pending routine of people in UK in 1971.Surprisingly, in following 30 years, it increased ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
....Surprisingly, in following 30 years, it increased to 43% and nearly twice as mu...
^^
Line 3, column 282, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly, in following 30 years, it increased to 43% and nearly twice as much as in 19...
^^
Line 4, column 307, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r the restaurant in 1971. Interestingly, it went up to double in next 30 years.Th...
^^
Line 4, column 347, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... it went up to double in next 30 years.The proportion of salary spent on the book ...
^^^
Line 4, column 477, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t of income expended for computer jumped from 2% to 12% in 2001.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65482233503 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82005166371 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578680203046 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.5387726937 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244718056906 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0965362508541 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666773622169 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164861182376 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719466334355 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.