The charts below show information on crime in the US for 2002. Write a report for a universal lecturer describing the information below.
As can be seen, the line chart discloses the correlation between age and the amount of criminality in the UK 2002 while the pie chart illustrates the proportions of different offences in the UK.
Undoubtedly, a noticeable high point of offences during the adolescence among the age groups in 2002. Furthermore, the convictions were sectored into 4 categories.
In 2002, the criminality began rising slightly at the age of 8, followed by an appalling upsurge to 70% among 16-year-old teens. The conviction rate then rocketed to a record high of 80% at the age of 20; thereafter, the rate immediately plunged all the way to 20%. Remaining a steady decline from the age of 28 to the age of 60, the percentages finally became lower than 10%.
The proportions and different reasons why the prisoners were in jail in the UK in 2002 are given in the pie chart, including violent crime, property crime, drug crime and public order crime. It is obvious that the crime type accounting for the highest portion was up to 40%, of which the prisoners were violent offenders. The second and the third largest portions were those convicted of property and drug criminalities, at 23% and 22% respectively. The smallest part was conviction for public order crime at 9%.
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995.Summarizes the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995. Summarizes the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevan 84
- Given are two pie charts displaying the categories of the annual spending divided by families in Canada between 1972 and 2002. 78
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, if, second, so, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1051.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91121495327 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89801390331 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584112149533 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.425110489 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.1 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121647823168 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0477365176197 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500125265471 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0633000599215 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05052196947 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.