Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technogy affected the types of relationships that people make?
Has this been a positive or negative development?
It is true that new technologies have influenced on communication between and technology has helped people interact more convenient. However, beside positive effects, it also has some negative effects.
On the one hand, people use technology to communicate more easily. For example, due to the Internet, business people can contact to partners in many different countries in order to discuss some problems regarding to cooperation. Students can exchange about some things they concern with teachers and friends in anywhere and anytime. Furthermore, technology help them interact faster than in the past. For instance, in the past they had to wait at least some days to receive a letter, but nowadays they only spend some minutes on sending and receiving an email. Alternatively, they only need to make a phone call to tell with someone without waiting.
On the other hand, technology brings some negative effects. Firstly, many of them communicate through the Internet rather than face to face, which leads to their relationships become estranged, especially in a family. They only have a few face-to-face meetings and they almost interact via social networks. Therefore, they will not still feel cozy whenever they are together. In addition, most young people make new friends on social networks like Facebook, Twitter so almost relationships are virtual, which helps cheaters have opportunities to bluff about money, love,…
In conclusion, new technologies have both positive and negative affects. Everybody should have some selections carefully to advoid some detrimental impacts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-20 | mary.ssherr | 56 | view |
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to successful career, while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school 73
- As most foreign aid often benefits the donor more than the receiver developing countries should refuse to repay their debts To what extent do you agree or disagree 72
- The graph shows the hours spent in different study methods during a two year course 61
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money.Discuss both t 56
- Levels of young crime are increasing rapidly in most cities around the world. What are the reasons for this, and suggest some solutions 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts, it also has some negative effects. On the one hand, people use technology t...
^^^
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...iness people can contact to partners in many different countries in order to discuss some prob...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to tell with someone without waiting. On the other hand, technology brings som...
^^^
Line 5, column 570, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...opportunities to bluff about money, love,… In conclusion, new technologies hav...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rtunities to bluff about money, love,… In conclusion, new technologies have bot...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, regarding, so, still, therefore, at least, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1356.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 244.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55737704918 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89074492268 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.631147540984 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.428971214 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8571428571 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4285714286 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8571428571 7.06120827912 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136579327168 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488156453365 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0311765882402 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0851460941762 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250259148204 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.