An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be paid subsidies for farming the new variety of millet. Since millet is already a staple food in Tagus, people will readily adopt the new variety. To combat vitamin A deficiency, the government of Tagus should do everything it can to promote this new type of millet.
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
While this is a great innovation and a great example of how science helps improve humanity, there are several points that need to be addressed before we conclude that switching to the new type of millet will be a success. Change is difficult, especially since this is with regards to an important aspect of the Tagus lifestyle. Food defines a countries culture and while this switch is beneficial to the people, it can have many social effects. As the international development organization and the Tagus government addresses the following issues, the transition to the new millet will be smoother and less chaotic.
The Tagus people are already impoverished, while the government will help farmers produce the new millet, will the millet cost more to the population buying it in the markets, or will it cost the same to the population. If the sell price will increase because of its nutritional value, then the switch to the new millet will be more difficult since the people are already struggling to feed themselves.
What are the major social issues that plague the Tagus people? In an impoverished nation, a vitamin deficiency may not be the immediate problem that the people of Tagus care about. Is there war and violence in the country? If that is the case, then the people of Tagus don't care about vitamins, they are worried about bombs and guns. Is the Tagus government filled with corruption? The government can promote the new millet with all of its might and power, however if the people don't trust the government officials to act in the populations best interest, then they won't believe that the government is trying to address a major nutritional issue that the people of Tagus face.
However on the flip side, if the major social issue that the people of Tagus face currently is deaths and sickness due to the deficiency in vitamin A then switching to the new millet will be relatively easy in addressing a major epidemic that has resulted in the sickness and death of the people of Tagus.
While vitamin A is a important to the body, if the people of Tagus are facing other immediate problems, then the transition will not be successful. However is the introduction of this new millet will address the immediate needs of the people, then the people will readily adopt the new variety of millet.
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 50
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 29
Comments
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
the arguments are not on the right track. Here goes a sample:
https://www.testbig.com/gmatgre-argument-task-essays/international-deve…
--------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ? out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 401 350
No. of Characters: 1880 1500
No. of Different Words: 166 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.475 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.688 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.566 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 129 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 89 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 58 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 46 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 26.733 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 14.299 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.402 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.576 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.125 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 617, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...llet will be smoother and less chaotic. The Tagus people are already impoverishe...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 270, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...t is the case, then the people of Tagus dont care about vitamins, they are worried a...
^^^^
Line 5, column 480, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... might and power, however if the people dont trust the government officials to act i...
^^^^
Line 8, column 20, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...he people of Tagus. While vitamin A is a important to the body, if the people of...
^
Line 8, column 148, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... the transition will not be successful. However is the introduction of this new millet ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.6327345309 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.9520958084 124% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 28.8173652695 76% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 55.5748502994 83% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 16.3942115768 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1925.0 2260.96107784 85% => OK
No of words: 398.0 441.139720559 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83668341709 5.12650576532 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63838836304 2.78398813304 95% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 204.123752495 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.427135678392 0.468620217663 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 604.8 705.55239521 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.70958083832 295% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.8473053892 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.3234319983 57.8364921388 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.333333333 119.503703932 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5333333333 23.324526521 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.2 5.70786347227 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.424628239503 0.218282227539 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150562755685 0.0743258471296 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0981473585534 0.0701772020484 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260474033082 0.128457276422 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515529230303 0.0628817314937 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.3799401198 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.3550499002 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.197005988 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.5979740519 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.32208582834 96% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 98.500998004 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.1389221557 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.