The given representations reveals the information about the number of gold, silver, and bronze medals obtained by different nations in the London 2012 Olympics games. The rank was determined by the number of achieved gold medals. It is a clear and coherent representation.
Overall, it is evident that the highest number of gold medals were being won by United States and the least by Australia during London 2012 Olympic games.
It is clearly seen that United States had been ranked at first position with 46 gold medals followed by China who had won 38 gold medals (ranked second). In addition to this, Russia performed very well by winning 24 (gold), 26(silver), and 32(bronze). Moreover, performance of South Korea was not as good as Russia; it only won 13 gold medals. However, the third position was occupied by Great Britain with 29 gold medals.
Moving ahead, both Germany and France won equal number of gold medals. Among all the ten nations, Hungary was the one who won least number of medals (only 17 in total). Apart from this, Italy and Australia won 8 and 7 gold medals respectively. Moreover, Australia also was ranked last among ten nations in terms of gold medals.
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or working a foreign country. Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language.Discuss both these views and give your o 73
- Nowadays families move to different countries for work. Some people think it has a negative effect on children, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- Some people believe that it s not necessary to have internet access to live a full life What is your opinion Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own experience 83
- The table below shows the number of medals won by the top ten countries in the London 2012 Olympic Games.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 73
- "Prevention is better than cure."Out of country's health budget, a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on health education and preventive measures. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'won the least'.
Suggestion: won the least
...he ten nations, Hungary was the one who won least number of medals only 17 in total. Apar...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, third, well, apart from, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 980.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87562189055 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49794846643 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557213930348 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.7082182319 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.6666666667 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.75 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170302018388 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714700244029 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720957197377 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13985109126 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611365936426 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.