Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology is now replacing their functions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is the fact that some governments are spending millions of dollars on the maintainance of libraries each year. Although some people agure that thanks to technology's forward, the authorities should not waste money in an attempt to maintain the libraries' operation, I firmly convince that traditional libraries have significant funtions and therefore should be sustanined for public access.
To begin with, technology, especially in accessing the Internet, is a vital resource with extensive digital-based information and up-to-date reading materials, which seems to put an decline of those who use libraries. The influence as a measurement for governments who shoulder their duties in either maintaining or developing the considerable human knowledge in all subjects but lower cost spending on staff member's salaries or maintainace's fee. It is vulnerable that citizens all around the world are able to acecess the high-standard terriary online papers and books through the wideless broadband Internet instead only particular libraries could offer in the past. Therefore, no one could deny that technology seems to replace the position of libraries in society due to its convenience and unlimitedness.
However, I strongly believe that traditional libraries are advantageous to some extent beyond the space and reliable knowledge resource. Majority of citizens are more likely to use libraries since they provide such a comfortable and quite enviroment to learning as well as enjoy reading books. This is highly beneficial, given the increasing number of sources of noise surrounding us these days. It is clear that traditional libraries represent the cultural and historical identity in a long time period, which is likely to store a lot of original books, making it a major contributor to human's civilization. Moreover, a great deal of online content without censorship is tended to misinformed public.
To conclude, although technology is considered to pose some external threats in maintaining a well-informed society, I believe that it would be a serious mistake to say keeping libraries open is a waste of money.
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of chrging people for admission to museums outweight the disavantage? 67
- Some people believe that it is more important to teach children the literature of their own country than other countries. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology is now replacing their functions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 89
- Some people believe that the range of technology available to individuals today is increasing the gap between rich people and poor people, while others say that technology has the opposite effect. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.To what extent do your agree or disagree with this opinion?What sort of punishment should parents and 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'libraries'' or 'library's'?
Suggestion: libraries'; library's
...ste money in an attempt to maintain the libraries operation, I firmly convince that tradi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 180, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...e reading materials, which seems to put an decline of those who use libraries. The...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1797.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51226993865 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1503664847 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622699386503 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.1145899827 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.75 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1666666667 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207117672564 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650229569168 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039842139369 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120038063377 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028591535333 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.16 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.