As far as I am concerned, it ie of great importance to enforce laws to prevent the big companies from polluting the air and water, because big companies with large scale of production can jeopardize the environment severely and have detrimental influence on the whole society. In addition, compared with the other two actions, the third action is more strict and has instant but endurable effect.
First and foremost, big companies that acquire larger amount of resources from the society have more responsibilities and once they ignore their responsibilities and merely concentrate on the profit, disasters will occur. For instance, if we look through the website for some environment news, it's not scarce that leaking petrol in the ocean, polluted water emission, and the abuse of detrimental chemicals happen everywhere on earth every day. Those big companies with big power are supposed to utilize advanced technologies to protect the environment, but without the laws they may only focus on their profit, making them to take the rick of harm the environment. Therefore, it is important to enforce laws to circumscribe the behavior of the big companies.
Furthermore, the big companies are under the supervision of the whole society, which amplifies their role of example. So if some big companies are reluctant or passive to participate into the action to protect the environment, the conscience of the employees and the head managers deserve to be suspected. And if people from these companies spread their false vale to their community and family, we cannot estimate the negative influence they have on the whole society. Likewise, if other startups and small companies witness the action of leader in their industries, it is likely the startups and small companies will emulate these big companies due to the pressure of survival and development. In this way, our society will be caught in the negative feedback, making environment protection impossible.
Last but not the least, compared with the other two actions, limitation on the big companies is apparently more effective because of their capacity and influence as I mentioned above. However, if we choose to give the research on environmentally friendly energy priority, there is no guarantee that we can obtain the energy timely to protect the environment. The long period of the researches inhibits us from adopting the first method as major action. Similarly, preserving the natural places could not have instance effect as the third action does because the protection of forests also demands abundant time. So the third action is more effective than other two actions, which adds importance to the third action.
In conclusion, enforcing laws to limit the companies is the most important action to take, not only because the responsibilities the big companies have on their shoulders and their model effect on the whole society, but also because it is more effective than the other two actions.
- Internet 76
- TPO-43 - Integrated Writing Task Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitiv 83
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 75
- The following appeared as part of a letter to the editor of a scientific journal.*"A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimulating sit 35
- asteroids establishing colonies 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, furthermore, however, if, likewise, look, may, similarly, so, therefore, third, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2503.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 477.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24737945493 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89576638422 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469601677149 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 798.3 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.6468847892 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.235294118 100.406767564 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0588235294 20.6045352989 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64705882353 5.45110844103 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151485335721 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056219588275 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605302979699 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0920408249285 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440870482374 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 11.7677419355 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 58.1214874552 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.