Reading books keeps a person’s mind active, whereas watching films and television is passive and does not require a person to use their imagination.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Reading books is a common method of retrieving information and acquisiting more knowledge. Some people argue that it keeps our mind more active than other ways like watching films or television. I strongly agree with this opinion.
Researchers prove that our brain basically requires an amount of time to absorb and proceed the input. While reading, our brain only deals with the text itself and is not distracted by other factors which, therefore, is giving sufficient time to maximizer our understanding. Additionally, it is usually difficult to grab the book authors' idea in a short period, which causes many of us have to read repeatedly. For instance, it might take a normal person one or several days to complete a 10-page book thoroughly.
In contrast, watching films or television tries to stimulate our brain in a passive manner in order to attract our attention. Movie producers put a numerable scenes with lots of graphical animation effects; compose musics with good melodies which, in turn, force our concentration on the display. Another aspect is that television program makers insert many advertisements within a movie as a method of relaxing users. As a consequence, our brain gets overwhelmed by a vast amount of information, which then is pushed to operate in a passive way. Even though a movie is only one or two hours in length, our brain has no room for imagination.
In conclusion, reading books uses a natural mechanism of brain to retrieve information. This maintains our mind active and enhance one's creative thinking as a whole.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-04 | umairhassan | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | coolchris2100 | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-10 | aycorek | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-17 | amanda.mosby | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-11 | Farrugh | 61 | view |
- Reading books keeps a person’s mind active, whereas watching films and television is passive and does not require a person to use their imagination.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
- Reading books keeps a person’s mind active, whereas watching films and television is passive and does not require a person to use their imagination.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
- The internet has greatly increased our access to information. To what extent do you think this is a good thing? 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 72, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a passive manner" with adverb for "passive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...television tries to stimulate our brain in a passive manner in order to attract our attention. Movi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'scene'?
Suggestion: scene
...ention. Movie producers put a numerable scenes with lots of graphical animation effect...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 530, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a passive way" with adverb for "passive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...mation, which then is pushed to operate in a passive way. Even though a movie is only one or two...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1308.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08949416342 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9288111178 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626459143969 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4931966081 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4285714286 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3571428571 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173977424582 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633229725567 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389003584684 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114855876139 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376116416228 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.