It is believed that some people are born with creativity and specific talents, and others are not. However, it’s sometimes claimed that taught developed creativity, and any child can become good sports person or musician. Discuss the two ideas are giving your opinion and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.
Recently the phenomenon of insinct creativity and talent in order to be a versatile person in sports or music and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although having these qualities since when someone born is beneficial as it regarded by the substantial numbers of individuals both constructive and positive, others hold opponents views. I am inclined to believe that the other factors affect this issue as it could develop brilliant aspects for its adherents.
From a social stanpoint, for becoming a prefessional sportsmen or women or a well-known musician some crucial factors must be considered and just having instinct talent is not sufficient. These factors are rooted in the fact of training. From my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the principles of being a successful musician. One of the most significant ones is working hard. This survey asserted that by performing a perticular program for training and practicing besides trying so hard, every one can become a prefessional musician though having talent and initial creativity is paramount as well. Furthermore, another fundamental factor was having appropriate targets. For completing this kind of scheme in order to become a prefessional person, every one should have affordable goals which encourage them to gain their desire.
On the one hand, the idea of having instinct skills and talent for being a sophisticated sports men or women has some advocates. They are argued that this factor is quite essential. According to a research undertaken by a prestigious universuty 30 percent of successful football players have initial instinct since they were born.
In conclusion, while there several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that by working hard every one can be a good sportsmen or women.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-13 | bashirheidari | 85 | view |
- Governments promise continuous economic growth, but it is actually illusion. Some people think that governments should abandon this. Give your opinion. 85
- “In a war of ideas, it is people who get killed”. Does a common man suffer from a group’s ideology? Express your opinion, and support the same with reasons and examples. 55
- The major purpose of television is to educate, not to entertain. Do you agree or disagree? 11
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. Cashless society seems to be a reality, and how realistic do you think? What are the advantages and disadvantage es of this phenomenon? 77
- The world’s governments and organizations are facing a lot of issues. Which do you think is the most pressing problem for the inhabitants on our planet and give the solution? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 138, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'sportsman'?
Suggestion: sportsman
...by working hard every one can be a good sportsmen or women.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, if, so, well, while, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 295.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37627118644 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0248154922 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603389830508 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5613771596 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.285714286 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64285714286 7.25397266985 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12786932724 0.242375264174 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0413017540187 0.0925447433944 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0318543018839 0.071462118173 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0799360889149 0.151781067708 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0194941305463 0.0609392437508 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 12.6369458128 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.