The best way to resolve the international environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Most people would accept that one of the highest priorities today is to find a solution to the various environmental problems facing mankind. While i agree that increasing the fuel prices offers certain advantages for the environment, i would argue that it is not the most optimum way to alleviate international environmental problems.
On the one hand, it is somehow advisable for governments to raise the taxes on fossil fuels. Practically, greater cost of transportation fuel would discourage one from using cars and motorbikes, which could promote public transport system simultaneously. This measure means a reduction on the exhaust emissions which are responsible for global warming and greenhouse effects. In addition, in terms of depletion of natural resources, raising the fuel prices would help remain and store the non-renewable fossil fuel sources and reduce the dependence of people on these energy sources. As the world supplies of oil will not last forever so the less we use fossil fuels, the more helpful we are to the environment.
On the other hand, i believe that when it comes to reducing the greenhouse gas emissions, some feasible measures could be taken to mitigate the problems of our environment. Firsly, introducing a restriction on the use of private vehicles must be high on the goverment agenda. This would many roads from heavy traffic by reducing the number of vehicles, which in return alleviates the problem of pollution caused by exhaust. For example, the congestion charge in some countries has partly lessened the degree of pollution. Secondly, it is necessary for the international bodies to allocate resources to the ability of alternative sources such as wind, solar and tidal energy, which create virtually little environmental damage. A shift from our traditional fuel consumption will create a long-term path for us human to walk on, reducing the amount of pollution we create, thus protecting our true home, the Earth.
In conclusion, although increasing the price of fuel can partially ease the problem of global environmental destruction, i believe that there are other feasible methods to deal with the global environmental issues.
- The diagram below shows the water cycle which is the continuous movement of water on, above and below the surface of the Earth. 56
- The diagram below shows the water cycle which is the continuous movement of water on above and below the surface of the Earth 93
- The diagram below shows how the Australian Bureau of Meteorology collects up to theminute information on the weather in order to produce reliable forecasts 68
- The best way to resolve the international environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Everyone should stay at school until 18. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...onmental problems facing mankind. While i agree that increasing the fuel prices o...
^
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...certain advantages for the environment, i would argue that it is not the most opt...
^
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... the environment. On the other hand, i believe that when it comes to reducing ...
^
Line 7, column 122, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...em of global environmental destruction, i believe that there are other feasible m...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32947976879 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02260188509 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575144508671 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1108506457 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.714285714 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179820296679 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0574154228673 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665772081232 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127963056964 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635737962037 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.