Traffic and housing problems should be solved by moving large companies, factories and their employees to the countryside. Do you agree or disagree
In our society nowadays, industry is becoming more and more vital. Accidentally, it causes many problems for transportation and housing. To tackle this problem, some citizens perceive that huge companies and labors should be moved to rural area. I totally agree with this point of view.
Regarding to traffic, it significantly innovates when massive plants are vanished. It is clear that the most satisfactory of transport improvement is a dramatic decrease of congestion.As we know, overwhelming numbers of people and vehicles are the root cause of traffic congestion and housing problems. Of course, through the practice of moving companies, the stress upon urban cities will be alleviated considerably. It is exemplified that labors do not must to go to central city for their works at peak hours so it does not cause heavy traffic jams anymore. To conclude, should those companies be located in urban, transportation will not refine effectively.
As far as houses is concerned, a life of human is more convenient with own accommodation. There are not only more spaces for people to construct their houses, but they also do not live in complex apartments invariably. For example, residents are not overwhelming because of many regulations of apartments. Also, they do have choice to possess their own houses for migration. As a result, should there be more land for people to purchase, they will tackle housing problem with a simplicity.
Although they are still detrimental effects on transportation and accommodation without industrial buildings, they should be moved to rural areas to be regarded as an effective way to solve this problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-30 | tuanah | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-30 | tuanah | 78 | view |
| 2019-04-04 | Jenny Trang Nguyen | 61 | view |
| 2018-06-15 | Vuong Linh | 54 | view |
- the pie chart below show units of electricity production by fuel source in australia and france in 1980 and 2000. 73
- The table below gives information about the average annual spending of university students in 3 different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 91
- Studies suggested that nowadays children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things. What are the reasons? What measures should be taken to encourage children to spend more time on active or creat 61
- The graph below shows radio and television audiences through out the day in 1992. 61
- the bar graph shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 184, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...nt is a dramatic decrease of congestion.As we know, overwhelming numbers of people...
^^
Line 2, column 455, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...y. It is exemplified that labors do not must to go to central city for their works at p...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 191, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e regarded as an effective way to solve this problems.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, so, still, as to, for example, of course, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28136882129 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09509440285 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600760456274 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.7867485118 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5333333333 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26666666667 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251470745848 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762480223977 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463963422314 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142721592735 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0175707306614 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.