Education for young people is important in many countries. However, the others think government should spend more money for education in adult population who cannot read and write. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In our society nowadays, education is becoming more and more crucial in every aspect of human life. Recently, some public debate is that whether government should support finance for illegible population or not? I totally agree with this point of view. Regarding the global industrialization, it is crucial for countries to seek effective employees, enabling to read and write.
Looking the former, the authority is advised to subsidize for people to renovate their ability of reading and writing to boost industry. It is identified that legible workers are disciplined skills for jobs with a simplicity. A training course invariably assembles numerous lessons to covey so each person need to hand down some intricate notes to remember all, being an example for this. Ton conclude, should illegible people still remain steadily, the country will redeem industrial development harshly.
As far as the unemployment is concerned, the rate will accelerate if the number of citizens without capability of reading and writing increases drastically. With regard to the employers, they solely employed legal people because they consider these employees have no restriction to implement their aspiration quickly. An explanation could be that there are various instruction attached to infrastructures without speech. Therefore, staffs must read them to conduct. It is exemplified that the machines in plan usually have some usage information on their surfaces to help workers operate smoothly.
In conclusion, although government have many concerns, they should plan a permanent financial support for illegible population. I would argue that education for youngsters is eclipsed by one for adult who cannot read and write because of the aforementioned reasons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-28 | doquytuan | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-27 | Evelyn_Han | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-15 | fachryadul92 | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-08 | IVANTRUONG | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-08 | IVANTRUONG | 67 | view |
- the table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. 73
- The 57
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010.Summarise the infomation by selecting and reporting the main feature, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- the pie chart below show units of electricity production by fuel source in australia and france in 1980 and 2000. 56
- the pie chart below show units of electricity production by fuel source in australia and france in 1980 and 2000. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, regarding, so, still, therefore, in conclusion, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6015037594 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00572314816 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665413533835 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.7339552185 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3333333333 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7333333333 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276577655466 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817191363795 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746497657295 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175219480633 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0976146793232 0.056905535591 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.