Writing task 1: TABLE – Using phone
The provided table demonstrates the proportion of phone users for diverse purposes from 2006 to 2010.
A glance at the given data reveals that phones was used most to make call and send and receive text massages. The regularity of using all features rose moderately over the period of 4 years, especially in these for entertaining aims.
The ratio of people using phones to make call was highest. It occupied the absolute percentage and maintained the same level between 2006 and 2008 before falling minimally to 99% in 2010. The figures for taking phone and sending and receiving text messages purposes had a slight growth through the shown period by 10% and 6%, respectively.
The rate of people who used phone to play games was 17% in 2006. It climbed significantly and reached the peak of 42% in 2008, then declined minimally to 41% in 2010. Likewise, the data for playing music intention also saw a gradual increase by 14% over the given period. The proportion of user searching the Internet and recording video peaked sharply from no data in 2006 to 73% and 35% in 2010, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-21 | Yashainu291 | 89 | view |
| 2024-03-04 | phuong cao | 11 | view |
| 2024-01-04 | AhaanIshaan | 11 | view |
| 2023-12-01 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-16 | phamquanghmu | 11 | view |
- A horizontal city or a vertical city 82
- Some people think that in the modern world we are more dependent on each other while others think that people have become more independent Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- The bar chart demonstrates the number of Olympic blazons gained by several countries in Asia, Europe and Americas. 73
- The line graph demonstrates how the percentage of British families that owned different number of cars oscillated between 1971 and 2007. 78
- Due to having a more comfortable working life, some people believe that workers should only follow an occupation. While I admit that this option can bring about many beneficial advantages, I would argue that a number of adverse consequences would be gener 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 101, Rule ID: MASSAGE_MESSAGE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'messages'?
Suggestion: messages
... to make call and send and receive text massages. The regularity of using all features r...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86170212766 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60266778201 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606382978723 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.2588039379 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177850628648 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770174916679 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738597166812 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120411807643 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336432712413 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.