The chart shows the proportion of people in a UK survey carried out in three different years who said they were interested in certain sports.
The bar chart demonstrates the percentage of British people interested in six different types of sports over three years: 1995, 2000 and 2005.
A glance at the given chart reveals that walking was the favorite sport of the largest number of people. It is also clear that while the proportion of people who like walking, swimming and rugby increased through the period shown, that of people who like playing snooker, tennis and golf showed the opposite trend.
First, the highest figure in 1995 was recorded in the number of people who interested on jogging, which is over 40%. It was then rose gradually by 2% every 5 years from 1995 to 2005. The percentage of swimming lovers increase significantly reach a peak of nearly thirty percent before Falling by two percent in two thousand and five. Meanwhile, the proportion of rugby players underwent a slight increase of about 3%.
It is also interesting that the figure for Snooker and tennis players both experiences a considerable decline of 8% and 6% respectively. The percentage of golf players was the most humble data which was only around 17% in 1995 climbed marginally by 1% between 2000 and 2005 after going down to 15% in 2005.
- Given are one table and two pie charts. The table provides data of the sum of tourists to Ashdown museum while two charts demonstrate the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visits, during the same periods. 78
- The line graph demonstrates how the percentage of British families that owned different number of cars oscillated between 1971 and 2007. 78
- The provided picture illustrates the entire development of a honey bee’s life. 78
- Writing task 1: TABLE – Using phone 78
- It is evident that the exponential development of technology has had significant influences on various means of people’s communication. While some people claim that it could result in several drawbacks, the opponents still strongly believe that there ar 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89655172414 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58925928245 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586206896552 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6949533613 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.444444444 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184195256357 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735033337134 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663530558774 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122037349025 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074433195897 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.