The line graph demonstrates how the percentage of British families that owned different number of cars oscillated between 1971 and 2007.
The line graph demonstrates how the percentage of British families that owned different number of cars oscillated between 1971 and 2007.
A quick glance at chart reveals that the number of families that had cars rise moderately through the period of 36 years. By contrast, the line of who owned one car maintains the same level.
It is clear that in 1971, the number of households that did not have car made up for the highest percent, at nearly a half of British inhabitants, followed by who had one car, at 45%. However, while the percentage of families who had no car fell sharply by 25%, the line of who owned one car stayed stable throughout the given period except some mild fluctuation.
The proportions of households who had two cars or more is insignificant, both are under 10% in 1971. Despite this fact, the given data of these shows an upward trend. The ratio of who had three cars or more suffered from a slightly climb by 3% whereas the number of families who had two cars rose considerably and reach the peak of over 25% in 2007.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-01 | ayshaaaaaaaa2018@gmail.com | 11 | view |
| 2018-06-16 | liz1102 | 78 | view |
- Some people think that in the modern world we are more dependent on each other while others think that people have become more independent Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- There are a lot of people tending to move from countryside to urban areas due to a higher standard of life 84
- The chart shows the proportion of people in a UK survey carried out in three different years who said they were interested in certain sports 78
- The provided charts demonstrate how three kinds of nutrients are distributed in average, healthy and sport diets. 61
- A horizontal city or a vertical city 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 222, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('climb') instead of another adjective.
...ho had three cars or more suffered from a slightly climb by 3% whereas the number of families wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.15609756098 380% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 867.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5873015873 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51894087428 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566137566138 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0916207135 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.375 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.427711635625 0.215688989381 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.22420382989 0.103423049105 217% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.297443960138 0.0843802449381 353% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.380916131802 0.15604864568 244% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.358748146799 0.0819641961636 438% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.