The table below gives information about rail transport in four countries in 2007.
Given is a table revealing some figures of the rail transportation system in four countries, namely Malaysia, Canada, China and UAE, during the year of 2007. All in all, it is evident from the information provided that Chinese used the rail service mainly for passengers who travelling considerably long distance, while freight of goods is the pivotal purpose of Canada railway.
A staggering number of 27 millions people is remarked for taking the rail transport in China in 2007, which outperforms other three countries. Both Malaysia and UAE, meanwhile, saw less than 6 millions travellers on their rails, while a meagre 0.3 million was registered in Canada. In terms of the distance of their expeditions, Chinese, likewise, took an average of 1980 km per head, whereas not less than 800 km was experienced by people in other three countries in their journey.
As for freight service, Canada's rail system dispatched the greatest amount of goods in 2007. Over 28 billions tons of goods was served by the service underpinned by railway. Second is the system from China, which held some 23.01 billions tons.
To elucidate, figures pertaining to people transportation service fluctuate far more than those found in cargo delivery industry in the given graph.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-23 | milothemilker | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | milothemilker | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | milothemilker | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | milothemilker | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-31 | Marita | 73 | view |
- As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or exp 77
- Communication is less between family members of late. Do you agree or disagree?To what extent do you agree? 84
- The graphs show figures relating to hours worked and stress levels amongst professionals in eight groups.Describe the information shown to a university/college lecturer. 84
- The charts below show the percentage of food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years. The graph shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurants and sit-down restaurants.Write a report for a university lecturer descr 73
- Scientists agree that many people are eating too much junk food and it is damaging their health. Some people think that this problems can be solved by educating people to eat less junk food. Other people believe that education will not work. Discuss both 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
likewise, second, so, whereas, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1062.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18048780488 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76736311889 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629268292683 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6303771345 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170121292986 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677204369014 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739585478408 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0934886148875 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630002700128 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.