The provided color chart illustrates the information on the expenditure of consumer goods in France and the UK during the year of 2010. Here the blue bar represents the spending on consumer goods of France and the orange bar for the UK. In the provided color chart, the X-axis shows the types of consumer goods and the Y-axis represents the pounds sterling spent by France and the UK.
As is observed from chart, both France and the UK had the highest expenditure on cars in 2010. France had the least expenditure on cameras while UK spent the least on perfume.
As is presented in the chart, in 2010, UK spent around 360,000 pounds on cameras, which might not seems high unless it is compared to the expenditure of France in the same items where only 150,000 pounds were spent. UK got a doubled amount on the expenditure on cameras than France. However, France spent just slightly higher, around 5% more, than France on computers. On the other hand, France spent the most, which is around 400,000 pounds, on cars while UK spent the same amount on books.
In conclusion, the market in the UK favored cars, books, cameras and computers and the similar scenario was true for the France excluding cameras.
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing (for example, through cellphone tracking and security cameras). In many cases the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening.Do you think the advant 73
- The chart below show the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010. 61
- The chart below show information about honey-bee colonies and honey production in the US. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 95, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s, cameras and computers and the similar scenario was true for the France excludi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1005.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76303317536 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39406399626 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469194312796 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8579741507 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.5 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191944483614 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0994170309141 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.095701857532 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122593985954 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105465294079 0.0819641961636 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.