Nowadays people throw away old things and adapt new things. Do the disadvantage of throwaway society outweigh any possible economics advantage?
It is clear that people havr ability to discard their old or damaged possession these days when they own something new. One of the most controversoil issues todat related to Is people ment of old things with ones gives benefit to the owner or not? In this essay, I am going to examine the question from both point of view.
One side of the argument there are people who argue that the demerits of consirderdoly, outweigh its disadvantage. The main reason for believing this is that wastage of electricity, gas and other resources because when there is increase in demand due to the more consumption of products, so the use of machinery will increase the pollution. One good illustration of this is recent state that canada and the united state of america contain only 52% of the world population and accountable 31.5% of consumptions, while south asia which had 22.4% of population is responsible for only 2% of consumptions.
On the other hand people often have this opinion minimum number of incident such as robberies and deaths, nowadays technology boom day by day as when people travel by car have no chance of their deaths because many features are available in cars so that is why no death contingents of individual. A second point is that there are no occasion of robberies because closed circuit television are available so no chance of robberies in modern era.
As we have seen that the there are number of answers to this question on balance however, I tend to believe that the possibilities are endless a person just have to take the change.moreover authories can also reduce their problem by making new laws such as reduce, recycle, reuse.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-27 | Mishika sugandhi | 89 | view |
| 2018-06-27 | Kalerbabal | 61 | view |
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001 73
- Some people say that computer games are bad for children by all means other believe that these games are contributed to children development.the discuss both view and give your apinion 67
- The bar chart below shows the result of survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company. The survey was carried out on two groups of workers: those aged from 18-30 and those aged 45-60, and show factor affecting 56
- Some people say that computer games are bad for children by all means other believe that these games are contributed to children development.the discuss both view and give your apinion 67
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991, 2001. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...I tend to believe that the possibilities are endless a person just have to take t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, moreover, second, so, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1377.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83157894737 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76657266024 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589473684211 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.3909165814 49.4020404114 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.0 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.6666666667 20.7667163134 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0963596376357 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0407370263994 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399659069835 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0566725476674 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352755101158 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.