The chart below shows the changes that took place in three differenet areas of crime in new port city centre from 2003-2012.
The graph represents the variation noticed in the three main areas of crime in the centre of newport city from 2003 to 2012.
To start with, it was 3400 incidences of burglary in 2003 and 3750 in 2004. Fortunately, in the next 4 years it fell down dramatically and reached the minimum figure of 1100 incidences. However, it then grew by 300 accidents and remained steady by 2012.
Car theft was a steady level of crime from 2003 to 2004 and got reduced in 2700 in 2012. As conpared, Robbery reached its peak in 2005, which was 900 cases and decreased back to 500 in 2008. In the following two years, the number of incidences rose to 700 and continued to stay at this level in 2012.
Overall, the rate of burglary fell significantely, the level of robbery remained fairly constant, where as car theft raised and had the biggest number of incidences in 2012.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-07-02 | Anureet kaur | 67 | view |
2018-06-29 | kaur meet | 61 | view |
- Young people in disturbed economies tend to become violent causing destruction to life and property What are the causes impacts and remedies of such problem 67
- The table shows the prices of steel vis a vis the consumption in selected countries 59
- In many countries women no longer need to get married. Some people believe that this is because women are able to earn their own income and therefore do not require financial security that marriage can bring. To what extend do you agree? 67
- Some people believe that they should keep all the money they have earned and should not pay tax to the state. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some people say that computer games are bad for childrens by all means while other believe that these games are contributing to childrens development. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... three main areas of crime in the centre of newport city from 2003 to 2012. To...
^^
Line 3, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...3750 in 2004. Fortunately, in the next 4 years it fell down dramatically and reac...
^^
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pared, Robbery reached its peak in 2005, which was 900 cases and decreased back t...
^^
Line 7, column 99, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...el of robbery remained fairly constant, where as car theft raised and had the biggest n...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t, where as car theft raised and had the biggest number of incidences in 2012.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 711.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58709677419 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54347423542 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567741935484 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 198.0 283.868780488 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2879769241 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.875 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185383977342 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829225209792 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112239513952 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132851591464 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130092812362 0.0819641961636 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.