The reading bring up three theories to explain the resource of strange noise which is heard by Russian crews in submarine. However, the professors states that there is no persuasive evidence of each of author's reason and rejects them.
The reading asserts that the origin of the quack noise are male Acru Whales to attract female Whales. The lecturer refutes this reason by stating that Acru whales lives on the surface of the oceans where the submarines don't patrol in these areas. She adds the Russian sailors in submarine were able to detect and discern the sounds created by Whales.
The lecture argues that giant squids are the source of noise. The lecture, nonetheless, believes that this would be more reliable argument in first view. She think it could not be compelling reason because the noise only continue for two decays and after twenty years it disappeared suddenly but the giant squids continue living.
The reading explain that these sounds maybe due to secret another country submarines. The lecturer rejects this reason by saying that the submarine are slow moving machines and they are not able to generate high pitch sounds like frog croaks. She states that even today there is no advanced submarine to move agile. In addition, he thinks the Russian sonar technology was able definitely to detect the noise engendered by the engine of foreign submarines.
- TPO-41 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO-32 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answe 3
- TPO-32 - Integrated Writing Task Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s, sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Alantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds. These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews 76
- TPO-33 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use spe 73
- TPO-33 - Integrated Writing Task Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types o 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...face of the oceans where the submarines dont patrol in these areas. She adds the Rus...
^^^^
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'She' must be used with a third-person verb: 'thinks'.
Suggestion: thinks
...re reliable argument in first view. She think it could not be compelling reason becau...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 13, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'explains'.
Suggestion: explains
... squids continue living. The reading explain that these sounds maybe due to secret a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, may, nonetheless, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1157.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 229.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05240174672 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31756397174 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585152838428 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3049879481 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4166666667 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0833333333 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06452816374 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304918455114 0.272083759551 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0981787421715 0.0996497079465 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628546462391 0.0662205650399 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161037049392 0.162205337803 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.079699863944 0.0443174109184 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.