The chart below show the percentage of fatal accidents by locations in a European country The survey was conducted in 2000

Essay topics:

The chart below show the percentage of fatal accidents by locations in a European country. The survey was conducted in 2000.

The given bar chart provides information on the rural and urban percentage of fatal accidents in a European country in the year 2000.

The chart showed that in rural areas, with high speed limits, the intensity of life taking crashes was very high. Speed limit of 30 mph or less caused around 24℅ fatal accidents, which was the least, followed by 35-40 mph limit where the mortality caused was about 31℅. In case of 45-50 mph, the percentage of death causing accidents was nearly 50℅. However, it soared to 81℅ when the speed limit was 55 mph but surprisingly, in the case of 60 mph or more the fatal crash proportion was lesser and at nearly 70℅.

The scene in urban areas is almost the opposite, at 30 mph or less speed, death causing accidents stood at 75℅, whereas at 36-40 mph it was at 68℅. In case of 45-50 mph, it was at 52℅ and it shrunk to 18℅ at 55 mph and then it increased to almost 28℅ at 60 mph or more.

The bar chart reveals that chances of mortality were higher at high speed in countryside, contrary to city area where more chances of casualty were noted at lesser speeds.

Votes
Average: 7.9 (5 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-06 Sandhu param 86 view
2019-07-30 parth patel officiall 54 view
2018-06-30 Kaurrippan0@gmail.com 79 view
Essays by user Kaurrippan0@gm… :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 227, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d it shrunk to 18℅ at 55 mph and then it increased to almost 28℅ at 60 mph or mor...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49509803922 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27537065352 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509803921569 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.4637927901 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.625 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172501084903 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100665050048 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797139066435 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131410889919 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105983061101 0.0819641961636 129% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.94 61.2550243902 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.