Some people say that, to reduce traffic congestion in large cities, governments should act to reduce the number of cars on the roads. Others say that it is the responsibility of individuals to use cars less and public transport more. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
The development of technologies in the car industry has encouraged the various car growth, in term of low cost, over fifty decades. The majority of people believe that this improvement triggers new problem on the road, such as traffic congestion. While the others said that more people ignore to use public transportation. I believe that both government and individuals share same responsibility toward the issue.
To begin with, overwhelming people having a car are caused by the availability of low-priced vehicles, such as city car, in the marketplace. Moreover, the trend to own private car give social value among the people, yet they still do not know and fewer perceptions the huge impact behind it. Some expert said, for instance, that increasing number of vehicle on the roads gives many effects to the environment and people too. Congestion and gas exhausted are main problems that always people face in the city, leading to some chronic and respiratory-related disease. Both should become attention carefully by the government in order to tackle the number of car ownership and to reduce traffic jam as well as pollution on the streets.
On the contrary, some people argue that the ignorance to use public transportation is also being a trigger to these issues. The skeptics have a strong viewpoint that, rather than using a car on roads, each person should make a habit and understanding the importance to use public transport in every activity. For example, if fifty percent of the city folks choose to ride the public transport to their work-places which means the possibility minimize traffic congestion and gas fumes as many as 50% as well. But, it is not easy to deal with miscellaneous mind of people in the city due to the ease to have a car.
Some part of the sceptics and the advocates include in my point of view. The government and individuals, therefore, should have perception more comprehensively regarding the consequences of private car. The government encourage the civil society to ride with public transport as well as regulating the policy to have a private car or by increasing tax over car ownership. Besides that, the government should also provide affordable and more convenient public transportation in order to obtain people interest, and the accessibility for disability too.
To sum up, I pretty sure that all of the stakeholders give a significant impact whether reducing or increasing the vehicle. Among them should synergize so the problem related to car ownership could become a positive opportunity for the people in the city.
- Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others. Why does it happen? How to solve this problem? 84
- International tourism is now more common than ever before. Some feel that this is a positive trend, while other do not. What are your opinions on this? 78
- In many countries, very few young people read newspapers or follow the news on TV. What do you think are the causes of this? What solutions can you suggest? 84
- With the increasing popularity of computers and calculators, student literacy is decreasing dramatically. What are the positive and negative effects the progress of science and technology has brought about? 78
- Some people think that getting a degree from university is the best way to guarantee a good job Others believe that it would be better to go straight into work and get experience instead Discuss both sides and give your opinion 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 248, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n the road, such as traffic congestion. While the others said that more people ignore...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 31, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...y too. To sum up, I pretty sure that all of the stakeholders give a significant impact ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, moreover, regarding, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, such as, as well as, on the contrary, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2163.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 423.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1134751773 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01606115957 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529550827423 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 688.5 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0112414201 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.842105263 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2631578947 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.89473684211 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382617532211 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110164414761 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544692602242 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20343683939 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497628758707 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.