the table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary school in 2005 and 2015.
given is a table illustrating information about the kinds of education problem made difficult for children in two school over the period of 10 years since 2005. in general, it is evident that the figure for school A higher for school B. Besides, the number of children faced the problems in school A overall decreased, while the number had the opposite trend.
in 2005, 42% of school A's pupil found it difficult to follow instruction, whereas only 6% of children in school B experienced this problem. Similarly, between 30 and 40 percent of children in school A had problems in the areas of spelling, listening, verbal expression of ideas, and concentration in lessons, while the data on school B stood at between 5 and 15 percent.
in 2015, the difference gap between 2 schools was shortened. the data on children who struggled to follow the instruction in school A decreased by 24%, and this school also saw the falls of 22%, 15%, 14% and 5% in the figures for children who had problems with concentration, listening, verbal expression and spelling, respectively. In school B, the ratio of children who struggled with spelling and following instructions doubled, to 10% and 12% respectively, and there was almost no change in the incidence of listening, verbal or concentration problem.
- The pie below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 78
- Some people regard to video games as harmless fun, or even as a useful education tool. Other, however, believe that videos games are having an adverse effect on the people who play them. In your opinion, do the drawbacks of video game outweigh benefits. 61
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 78
- the graph below changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 to 2011 73
- the table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary school in 2005 and 2015. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Given
given is a table illustrating information abo...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...over the period of 10 years since 2005. in general, it is evident that the figure ...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ile the number had the opposite trend. in 2005, 42% of school As pupil found it d...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...l B stood at between 5 and 15 percent. in 2015, the difference gap between 2 scho...
^^
Line 3, column 61, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ce gap between 2 schools was shortened. the data on children who struggled to follo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, similarly, so, whereas, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1075.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97685185185 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01280062277 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.8650786707 43.030603864 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.375 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334168188223 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158245087006 0.103423049105 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762452954207 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235006548178 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0769722412327 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.