Humans arrived in the Kaliko Islands about 7,000 years ago, and within 3,000 years most of the large mammal species that had lived in the forests of the Kaliko Islands were extinct. Previous archaeological findings have suggested that early humans generally relied on both fishing and hunting for food; since archaeologists have discovered numerous sites in the Kaliko Islands where the bones of fish were discarded, it is likely that the humans also hunted the mammals. Furthermore, researchers have uncovered simple tools, such as stone knives, that could be used for hunting. The only clear explanation is that humans caused the extinction of the various mammal species through excessive hunting.
Write a response in which you discuss one or more alternative explanations that could rival the proposed explanation and explain how your explanation(s) can plausibly account for the facts presented in the argument.
The author concludes that humans are responsible for the decline of most of the large mammals species in Kaliko Island. Stated in this way, the author failed to mention several key factors on the basis of which the argument needs to be evaluated. To justify this argument, the author reasons that humans have killed the large mammals species in order to get the food from them. However, careful scrutiny of the evidence reveals that it provides a little creditable support to author's conclusion.
First of all, there may be various factors for the extinction of large species in Kaliko Island. Discovery of simple tools like stone knives doesn't assure that humans have killed them. May be early humans have used them for their safety and protection from attack of large mammals or for some other purposes like getting fruits from trees by cutting it through that knife. Moreover, small tools can't be used to kill a large species. Furthermore, there may be some natural disaster which cause the extiction like earthquake or fire in the Island. Thus, if the author had provided some more information about the previous condition of kaliko Island in terms of natural disaster, it could make the argument more convincing.
Seocondly, the author claims after discovery of bones of fishes that humans have killed them and further concludes that they've also killed the mammals. However, there may be the possiblity that other animals who rely on fishes may have hunt them. For example, fish is the favouriate food for wild animals like fox. Thus, without much information about the cause of death for fishes, it can't be concluded that humans have destroyed them. Furthermore, catching the fish is an easy task instead of killing a mammal for food. Thus, humans might have killed fishes for their survival but it doesn't clearly signifies that they've also killed mammals due to which they become extinct.
Furthermore, archeologists does give an idea by looking at the evidences. They donot precisely concludes the scenarios based on the evidence. Furthermore, there is a possibility that most of the large species is present in Kaliko Island which archeologist won't be able to find or may be these species have changed their place for survival and moved to some other island. If the author had provided a much more clear evidences about the death of large mammals as well, the argument could make a cogent effect on the claim of the author.
In conclusion, the author's argument is unpersuasive as it stands. To bolster it further, the author must provide clear concrete evidences, perhaps by the way of a reliable survey about the cause of extinction of animals. Finally to better assess the argument, it would be necessary to know more about the previous disasters occurred in the island. Since the author doesn't mentioned anything about discovery of bones of mammals in the Kaliko Island, it can't effective said that they've extinct. Some more detailed analysis should should be done by archeologist to find their bones so as to assure that they're actually extinct.
- A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor. 50
- The following appeared in a memo at XYZ company."When XYZ lays off employees, it pays Delany Personnel Firm to offer those employees assistance in creating résumés and developing interviewing skills, if they so desire. Laid-off employees have benefited 59
- The following argument was made in a newspaper editorial:“The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders; if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked, both its economy and national identity are endangere 59
- The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the trends of its youth.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev 50
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling r 66
Comments
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
it is argued on the wrong way. read the topic carefully.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 25 15
No. of Words: 519 350
No. of Characters: 2514 1500
No. of Different Words: 218 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.773 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.844 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.4 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 188 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 125 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 74 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 44 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.76 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.617 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.76 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.309 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.497 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.108 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'mammals'' or 'mammal's'?
Suggestion: mammals'; mammal's
...le for the decline of most of the large mammals species in Kaliko Island. Stated in thi...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 327, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'mammals'' or 'mammal's'?
Suggestion: mammals'; mammal's
...asons that humans have killed the large mammals species in order to get the food from t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...overy of simple tools like stone knives doesnt assure that humans have killed them. Ma...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...rough that knife. Moreover, small tools cant be used to kill a large species. Furthe...
^^^^
Line 5, column 121, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they've
... killed them and further concludes that theyve also killed the mammals. However, there...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 237, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'hunted'.
Suggestion: hunted
...her animals who rely on fishes may have hunt them. For example, fish is the favouria...
^^^^
Line 5, column 387, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...about the cause of death for fishes, it cant be concluded that humans have destroyed...
^^^^
Line 5, column 387, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cants'?
Suggestion: cants
...about the cause of death for fishes, it cant be concluded that humans have destroyed...
^^^^
Line 5, column 587, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...killed fishes for their survival but it doesnt clearly signifies that theyve also kill...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 617, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they've
...al but it doesnt clearly signifies that theyve also killed mammals due to which they b...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 20, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...im of the author. In conclusion, the authors argument is unpersuasive as it stands. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 222, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...out the cause of extinction of animals. Finally to better assess the argument, it would...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 366, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ccurred in the island. Since the author doesnt mentioned anything about discovery of b...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 453, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...nes of mammals in the Kaliko Island, it cant effective said that theyve extinct. Som...
^^^^
Line 9, column 453, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cants'?
Suggestion: cants
...nes of mammals in the Kaliko Island, it cant effective said that theyve extinct. Som...
^^^^
Line 9, column 478, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they've
...iko Island, it cant effective said that theyve extinct. Some more detailed analysis sh...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 522, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: should
...ve extinct. Some more detailed analysis should should be done by archeologist to find their b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 580, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...one by archeologist to find their bones so as to assure that theyre actually extinct.
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 601, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
...o find their bones so as to assure that theyre actually extinct.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, thus, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, by the way, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 13.6137724551 132% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 28.8173652695 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 55.5748502994 130% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 16.3942115768 98% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2560.0 2260.96107784 113% => OK
No of words: 511.0 441.139720559 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00978473581 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75450408675 4.56307096286 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48311842692 2.78398813304 89% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 204.123752495 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.438356164384 0.468620217663 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 800.1 705.55239521 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 19.7664670659 126% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6634132063 57.8364921388 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.4 119.503703932 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.44 23.324526521 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36 5.70786347227 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 19.0 5.25449101796 362% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 6.88822355289 203% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235507366279 0.218282227539 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076566425561 0.0743258471296 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761152288436 0.0701772020484 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156423632316 0.128457276422 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386229379882 0.0628817314937 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.3799401198 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.3550499002 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.5979740519 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.32208582834 95% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 98.500998004 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.