The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 nad 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts indicate the proportion of the population owning a computer over an 8-year period and compare computer ownership by education level in 2002 and 2010.
Looking at the first bar graph in detail, it is clear that there was an upward trend in the computer ownership. More specifically, in 2002, well under 60% of the population had a computer. The figure subsequently experienced a period of slight growth and finished at about 70% in 2010.
Besides this, the second graph reveals that the higher education people had, the larger the rate of computer owners was. The percentage of post...
- In many parts of the world children and teenagers are committing more crimes Why is this happening How should they by punished 78
- In many countries, the quality of life in the large cities is worsening. What possibly can cause this problem? What measures can be taken to resolve it? 85
- It is generally believed that the Internet is an excellent means of communication but some people suggest that it may not be the best place to find information Discuss both views and give your own opinion 28
- In many countries where capital punishment has been abolished there has been a corresponding rise in violent crime rates For this reason many governments are considering its reintroduction as a form of deterrent Should Capital Punishment be re introduced 76
- The two pie charts below show the marital status of Australia's and Canada's populations for 1999 and 2000 respectively.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below. 93
Sentence: Looking at the first bar grahp in detail, it is clear that there was an upward trend in the computer ownership.
Error: grahp Suggestion: graph
Sentence: It is also intesting to note that the rates for all the six categories under study increased between 2002 and 2010.
Error: intesting Suggestion: No alternate word
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 8.0 out of 9
Category: Excellent Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 166 200
No. of Characters: 797 1000
No. of Different Words: 100 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.589 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.801 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.646 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 61 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 38 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 28 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 18 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.444 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 3.804 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.778 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.419 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.579 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.035 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4