Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion.
There is an opinion which argues that the tourists from other countries should spend more money on visiting traditional or cultural places than indulgent people. In my view, it would be beneficial to get more money from foreign visitors because of some obvious reasons.
Getting more money from foreign travelers can spend on conservation and protection of the historical place. It is clear that tourists from other countries have different culture and values and also they may not care enough about the historical values of the visiting place because of these kinds of differences, and that lack of attention might cause littering trash in the place or it may lead the host country to need an improvement in surveillance in order to prevent serious damages of valuable and monolithic phenomena such as statues or buildings.
Furthermore, imposing a higher fee for overseas travelers may seem a little discriminatory, but local residents pay taxes monthly and it is not fair to pay equally for visiting places like museums or historical palaces in the city. In fact, citizen’s pay taxes for improving infrastructures and maintaining such these places in their city and it is justifiable to impose lower-price ticket for visiting such places.
Additionally, it is obvious that tourist attractions are a major help for the host countries’ economy, however, it is a source of education for local visitors. Thus, it would be reasonable to reduce the fees for education and increase them for people who want to spend their disposable income in order to know other’s culture. It means that it is not necessary for foreign visitors to visit some places in other countries and they do it because of their interests, but it is compulsory for local residents to visit such these attractions to learn their country’s history and culture.
To conclude, I believe that higher price for international visitors is a reasonable idea because tourist industry is crucial for host country’s economy and residents pay their share in taxation besides the income could be spent on protecting and maintaining the cultural places well.
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping, etc. and whether you support them or not. 77
- Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss pros and cons impacts. 11
- If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/subject will you choose? 11
- Whether the design of the building will have a positive or negative impact on people s life and work 44
- Some people think that it is better for children to learn a foreign language at primary school. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...itors because of some obvious reasons. Getting more money from foreign traveler...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...henomena such as statues or buildings. Furthermore, imposing a higher fee for o...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...price ticket for visiting such places. Additionally, it is obvious that tourist...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ir country's history and culture. To conclude, I believe that higher price...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, well, in fact, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1805.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24709302326 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01119996735 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502906976744 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 20.2975951904 168% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 95.9364894084 49.4020404114 194% => OK
Chars per sentence: 180.5 106.682146367 169% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.4 20.7667163134 166% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209019639056 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973243728782 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382995813988 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125166780707 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370275781183 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.5 13.0946893788 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.1190380762 154% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.