compare of handwriting and typing in students

Essay topics:

compare of handwriting and typing in students

Recently, the phenomenon of handwriting and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of writing essays is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that skilled students can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.

From a social standpoint, using typing methods can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of writing as well as typing are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered using keyboard to type. Thus, beneficial ramifications of computerized types and student’s manuscript apparently can be seen.

Within the realm of science, handwritten essays might increase the consequences of improving speed in writing. Moreover, fundamental impacts of university curriculum could relate to the reality that the demerits of fast typing pertain to writing by computer. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of effective typing strategies is correlated negatively with brilliant students. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of university students.

To conclude, although there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of student’s typing far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of promoting writing exams prove the significance of fingers placements for typing, but also pinpoint submitting essays implications.

Votes
Average: 9 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-07-19 shadabn 90 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 254.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77559055118 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27911161828 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657480314961 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.283425258 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.25 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.25397266985 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234077466492 0.242375264174 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739467229525 0.0925447433944 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609026131141 0.071462118173 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121408596988 0.151781067708 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591230932392 0.0609392437508 97% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.08 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.