In the lecture, the professor makes a series of points that cast doubt on all the arguments presented in the reading passage about the cloud seeding to prevent the hail and protecting crops from damage. She states it is not clear that cloud seeding is effective to prevent the hail and all the arguments have flaw.
First of all, although the reading claims there are labratory experiments support cloud seeding, the professor states they have flaw. She clarifies that it is true that silver iodine added to cold water changed the freezing point and made snow instead of hail but it will prevent any other percipitation as well. By preventing any percipitation drought would happen and crops would simply damage.
Moreover, reading passage argues due to effectiveness of cloud seeding in asia it would be accepted for united state.However the speaker beleives they would not necessary repeated in united state. In fact, in asia this method was done in urban area with air pollusion and polusion is a favorable condition for this pattern. So she claimes they may not occur in not polluted cities of USA.
Lastly, the professor refutes the local studies in cloud seeding which the passage claimes about. She states this argument is not convincing as the hail damage decreased in neighboring area of the study in south and east part at the same time. Therefore, it could be more possible the result of natural variation not just cloud seeding.
- Many studies have found sucralose to be perfectly safe for people to consume. And it is useful for people who are trying to lose weight. The reading’s arguments against using sucralose can all be changed.First, about sucralose affecting the thymus. If y 80
- tpo38 3
- TOPIC # 55 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A person should never make an important decision alone. 66
- Some young adults wants independence from their parents as soon as possible. Other young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer time. Which of these situations do you think is better? Use specifics reasons and examples to support your opin 73
- TPO 35- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 40
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 310, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'flawed'.
Suggestion: flawed
...ent the hail and all the arguments have flaw. First of all, although the reading cl...
^^^^
Line 2, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g claims there are labratory experiments support cloud seeding, the professor sta...
^^
Line 2, column 130, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'flawed'.
Suggestion: flawed
...seeding, the professor states they have flaw. She clarifies that it is true that sil...
^^^^
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...a it would be accepted for united state.However the speaker beleives they would not nec...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...a it would be accepted for united state.However the speaker beleives they would not nec...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, lastly, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, in fact, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1201.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 243.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94238683128 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51608317123 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567901234568 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 367.2 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2715138904 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.181818182 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0909090909 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27272727273 7.06452816374 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130433213514 0.272083759551 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489259928239 0.0996497079465 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0293669397522 0.0662205650399 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0816610574868 0.162205337803 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0161082835222 0.0443174109184 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.