When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
A country’s development in technology influences on the traditional style of life very significantly. Looking at those countries which have high technologies, we can easily notice the consequence of developing it and the state of the traditional life. I think Technology is the reason for disappearing traditional skills and ways of life. However, I do not consider it is pointless trying to keep them alive.
Technology is the sphere which is developing very fast. Also, it aids to make life easier and more convenient. Therefore, nowadays all countries are paying more attention to the develop...
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2013-11-14 | sliwer | 75 | view |
2013-11-10 | Mita Puspasari | 83 | view |
2013-09-09 | D O N | 87 | view |
2012-11-09 | maryam2900 | 76 | view |
- When the time comes to commence full time employment individuals who have graduated from university deserve a high salary than those who have not To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion 68
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves? 68
- Compare the advantages and disadvantages of three of the following as media for communicating information. State which you consider to be the most effective.• comics• books• radio• television• film• theatreGive reasons for your answer and include any rele 65
- More and more people claim that modern work patterns are a source of stress What do you think are the cause of this Can you suggest some possible solution 69
- The diagrams below show the growth in population in Australia in 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 86
flaws:
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.762 21.0
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 352 350
No. of Characters: 1792 1500
No. of Different Words: 181 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.331 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.091 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.952 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 127 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 97 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 78 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 61 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.762 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.746 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.714 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.313 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.508 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.125 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5