When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
A country’s development in technology influences on the traditional style of life very significantly. Looking at those countries which have high technologies, we can easily notice the consequence of developing it and the state of the traditional life. I think Technology is the reason for disappearing traditional skills and ways of life. However, I do not consider it is pointless trying to keep them alive.
Technology is the sphere which is developing very fast. Also, it aids to make life easier and more convenient. Therefore, nowadays all countries are paying more attention to the develop...
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-11-14 | sliwer | 75 | view |
| 2013-11-10 | Mita Puspasari | 83 | view |
| 2013-09-09 | D O N | 87 | view |
| 2012-11-09 | maryam2900 | 76 | view |
- Private companies, that support and carry out scientific researches, are spending more than governments in these days. Do the advantages of this development outweigh its disadvantages? Explain your opinion and give specific reasons. 80
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves? 68
- When a country develops its technology the traditional skills and ways of life die out It is pointless to try and keep them alive To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 87
- The diagrams below show the growth in population in Australia in 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 86
- Some people think that scientists experimenting with animals in a laboratory is the only way we can guarantee new products will be safe for human To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 86
flaws:
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.762 21.0
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 352 350
No. of Characters: 1792 1500
No. of Different Words: 181 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.331 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.091 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.952 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 127 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 97 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 78 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 61 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.762 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.746 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.714 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.313 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.508 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.125 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5