The reading passage and listenning passage both discuss about usage of the great houses of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the twelfth century A.D. The author brings up three theories about he argument. However, the lecturer casts doubt on these theories and provides some reasons.
First of all, the author says about first theory which explains that the structures of Chaco people used residentially. Nevertheless, the lecturer opposes this claim by explaining that altough, the outside of buildings were seemed similar to structures of Southwest communities, inside of buildings were very different of them. The lecturer, on the other hand, points out that there were not enough fire place for these structures. Thus, he beleives that the structures were not for residential usage.
In the second place, the author mentions the second theory which is claims that the Chaco structures used for food supply storage. By contrast, the lecturer refutes this claim by mentioning that the structures did not contain enough container for storage of food supply. This is a good standpoint to refute author's claim.
Finally, the author states the third theory which is points out that the house used for ceremonial centers. However, the lecturer opposes this point by explaining that the pots were trash of construction servers and all the metarials not used up instead they were trash.
- TOEFL integrated writing: Chaco housing 3
- integrated 3
- Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals. Altruism is the opposite of selfishness; individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves.Examples of altruism 75
- Young People enjoy life more than older people do 60
- People learn things better from those at their own level- such as fellow students or co workers- than from those at a higher level, such as teachers or supervisors. 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: HE_THE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'about the argument'?
Suggestion: about the argument
....D. The author brings up three theories about he argument. However, the lecturer casts doubt on t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, third, thus, first of all, in the second place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1165.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 222.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24774774775 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54745162467 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3754257674 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.909090909 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1818181818 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9090909091 7.06452816374 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297605477111 0.272083759551 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116261782505 0.0996497079465 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561771787957 0.0662205650399 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178980948499 0.162205337803 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321856511397 0.0443174109184 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.