The importance of historical building, has been debatable, has upsurged a lot of argument in favour and against it; thus, it has become even more controversial. The substantial influence of preserve the beautiful building of the past has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend in an integral part of society. It can be agreed that upside of beautiful infrastructure is instrumental indeed; however, it has some drawbacks as well. This essay will elaborate the both assertions and provide a well-weighed conclusion.
The above presented dissertation illustrates both perspectives about the impact of historical places, while it is evident that it has various benefits, although it’s deleterious effects cannot be ignored and well addressed and well balanced against its merits.
- some people give the opinion that working women do not pay attention to bring up children . hence they should be discouraged from doing job , what extent agree and disagree 77
- The table below shows the sales at a departmental store Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 83
- Do you think card less society is realistic and why? what are the advantages and disadvantages 77
- Some people cliam that not enough of the water from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast 56
- Parents should be held legally responsible for children’s activities. What is your opinion? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, thus, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 31.9359605911 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 691.0 1207.87684729 57% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 123.0 242.827586207 51% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61788617886 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.33024571262 3.92707691288 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20366470042 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 139.433497537 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.682926829268 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 214.2 379.143842365 56% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.65517241379 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 12.6551724138 40% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9012315146 50.4703680194 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.2 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.25397266985 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.12807881773 48% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1628961354 0.242375264174 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788516548191 0.0925447433944 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.033796330632 0.071462118173 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115045819016 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0730267108097 0.0609392437508 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.6 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 55.0591133005 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 200 words wanted.
Rates: 22.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.