The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
The table illustrates the proportion of expenditure of citizens from five various nations in the year 2002. In general, it can be seen that every consumer in all the five countries tended to spend more money on food, drinks and tobacco than clothing and footwear, which was then followed by leisure and education.
First of all, Turkey was the country where citizens spent most of their money on food, drinks and tobacco (32.14%) than any other countries which were lower than 30%. A similar trend can be observed for the spending on leisure and education, that is consumers in Turkey allocated the majority of their money in this sector (4.35%) compared to other nations (less than 3.50%) with the minority of consumers from Spain (1.98%).
Turning to the expenditure on clothing and footwear, Italy turned out to be the country which had its citizens to spend most of their incomes to buy clothes and footwear (9.00%), which was then followed by Turkey (6.63%) and the country with the least spending on these stuff was Sweden (5.40%). Besides, Sweden was also the country which spent the least money on food, drinks and tobacco among the five countries (2.21%).
- Eating sweet foods produces acid in the mouth, which can cause tooth decay. (High acid levels are measured by low pH values)Describe the information below and discuss the implications for dental health. 61
- A large number of unmarried youngsters now live on their own in cities away from their hometowns What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend 78
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Nowadays some people think that public libraries are not necessary, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion and examples. 71
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, so, then, in general, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 958.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86294416244 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26514275599 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507614213198 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.5627350118 43.030603864 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.666666667 112.824112599 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.8333333333 22.9334400587 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162602842114 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968079793111 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0288747105449 0.0843802449381 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128070462929 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041177442691 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.5 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.